Mar.25
2009
Busy, Busy...
Post Comment   
I still have about 30 plates spinning here, so this is going to be a slow posting week, I'm sorry to say. As I mentioned, my cousin and I are working on a video all week, and I'm also doing the UI for the next product.

In that light, a couple of little things that might be interesting. First up, Puremagnetik has a new Micropak out this morning, B-System: Percussives, which is short, sharp samples from a Buchla 200e. This is intriguing on a couple of levels, as (a) it's probably useful, and (b) it strongly implies they'll be doing other Buchla sample sets. Downloading it now.

Next, and the true point of this post. I'm pondering writing a (shortish) book, at my wife's behest. The reason for this pondering is that I noticed both with the Delia Derbyshire posts and the Pierre Schaeffer comments in the previous thread that some people were like "who the fuck?" I thought it might be interesting to make a primer of sorts with a section on each of the people that comprise the core of the birth of electronic music. I remarked to Adam this morning that for many people the sun rises and sets with Bob Moog and Wendy Carlos, and that's actually a bit sad, as there are people that certainly deserve common recognition but have thus far managed to avoid the limelight.

Obviously, this would not be a learned textbook, but rather a creative overview, as is my wont. In that light, I'm trying to compose a list of who might be included, in order to determine what I might be in for. So far, I have the following:

Delia Derbyshire, Pierre Schaeffer, Bruce Haack, Piero Umiliani, Louis and Bebe Barron, Maurice Martenot, Luigi Russolo (maybe), Evgeny Murzin (tough to find info on), Herbert Eimert, Raymond Scott (possibly), Pietro Grossi.

Obviously, I'm not interested in making a complete Tome On The History Of Electronic Music, as there are many unreadable examples of same, but rather just a little primer on some people that should be known, and putting it in a nice collectible package. I imagine there will be many, many people that should be on that list but aren't. While that's certainly true, I'm not really interested in people that didn't have a measurable impact on things. It's like the Vikings discovering America. When Christopher Columbus discovered it, it stayed discovered. I don't really care about what someone did in their garden shed if it can't be put in the timeline with following events. (I'm thinking of that Polish woman who's name escapes me right now.)

Anyhow, if there's names that shouldn't be in that list that are, or names that should be that aren't, I'm willing to hear arguments. And if you're planning on just posting a name or list of names with no support and making me look each one up, seriously, you know the drill here. Support your argument with, like, facts and stuff or don't bother.

Comments:
some... Dick Raaijmakers, Luc Ferrari, Raymond Scott, Vladimir Ussachevsky, Tod Dockstader, Rune Linblad, Alvin Lucier, David Tudor, Iannis Xenakis, Pauline Oliveros

posted March 25, 2009 by Quiet Ovens
...oops, meant to type his name first:
Bernard Parmegiani

posted March 25, 2009 by Quiet Ovens
hugh le caine, for his electronic sackbut. it was basically a synthesizer with a keyboard that allowed the player to apply vibrato to every note separately. made in 1945.

edgar varese, for thinking in sounds instead of instruments.

and the inventor of the hammond novachord, for the spookiest synth sound out there. made in 1937.

posted March 25, 2009 by minz

A book you should read for inspiration is "The Rest Is Noise" by Alex Ross, it's basically a very well written collection of biographies of the key composers of the 20th century, and it does deal with early electronic stuff quite a bit.

posted March 25, 2009 by pingu
bruce haack was creepy.. i think mainly because much of his music was aimed at kids. WHY BRUCE, WHY ARE YOU SCARING THE CHILDREN?

"wooden bread" is terrifying on several levels.

posted March 25, 2009 by tremorcore

Here's my 2 cents worth:

Robert Margouleff and Malcolm Cecil- their work with TONTO and especially with Stevie Wonder brought modular synthesizers and electronic production to a much larger stage than before and foreshadowed the large role that synthesizers were soon to play in popular music.

Kaija Saariaho- Finnish composer who has played a huge role in expanding the role of electronics in the synthesis of electronic music and live performance.


+1 on Xenakis, assuming your scope includes stochasticism.




posted March 25, 2009 by drewkeys

Edgard Varese because he was the prophet of electronic music. At one point he stopped writing music because the timbres he so desired were not yet possible. His writings around this time foreshadowed the use of synthesizers and computers in musical practice. Also, he was a massive influence for frank zappa. Furthermore, his pieces "ionization" and "poem electronique" totally kick ass.

posted March 25, 2009 by nathanj
Gil Melle deserves to be on the list imho. He not only did the awesome score to the Andromeda Strain, he built his own instruments and (I didn't know this, but according to Wikipedia, cuz I just looked it up) wrote the first all-electronic TV theme for Night Gallery. Plus he seems like a bad-ass beatnik who would have been cool to hang out with.

posted March 25, 2009 by mofman
Ah, forgot about Gil. That's a good one.

-CR

posted March 26, 2009 by Chris Randall

Although they're a little late in the game, how about the guys behind the Fairlight CMI, Peter Vogel and Kim Ryrie?
The introduction of the first commercially available digital sampling instrument was quite the game-changer.

posted March 26, 2009 by Robin
Post a Comment:
You must be logged in to comment.
Login
Welcome to posiNET!
   New User
   Returning Member

Search
Enter your search term below to search analogindustries.com:
Now on kPOSI
» hi-fi stream  (128kbps)
Eco-Hed - st - Panic in Needle Park
» lo-fi stream  (32kbps)
Scanalyzer - Neutron Dub