Mar.6
2008
The Long(er) Tail...
Post Comment   
darklordjames just turned me on to this article, which has apparently been making the rounds of the creative community today. (And with good reason.) Obviously, I have some thoughts about this, but first things first, go read the entire article, because there will be a test later. Go ahead. I'll wait.

Now, setting aside for the moment that this article has been quickly adopted by the BoingBoing set (a member of which, as you all know, I most certainly am not), and it does trend a little Disney, the concept is absolutely sound. Between when I was dropped from TVT and when I finally gave up on SMG, I made most of my living in exactly the manner described in that article, and can state from personal experience that it rings true. Mr. Kelly has, in fact, hit the nail on the head for the most part.

There are caveats to his plan, which he fails to mention. BoingBoingers and their ilk will fall all over themselves setting up tip jars and having a group hug, but getting those thousand people to pony up whenever you poop out a track is no easy task. The SMG fan base, which numbered in the several hundred thousands at one time, has rendered down after a decade of abuse on my part to about 800 people I can count on to put up with most anything I do, and another 3000 or so that will turn up eventually. Of those 800 people, I know at least 200 by sight, and am on a first name basis with almost all of them once I'm reminded of who they are. Elle knows them all and then some; she's better with names and faces than I am. She can even remember specific things about many, like what size shirt they wear, where they live, what they said to her the last time they saw her, and things like that.

I'm left with the nagging suspicion that I squandered a lot of "true fans" as Mr. Kelly states it, by either my musical schizophrenia or my short temper, and of course there's a certain amount of regret there. This brings me to the caveats in a roundabout way:

1: Master your craft. You can't suck to begin with. The article semi-implies that you have a right to these thousand people. In actual fact, you need to move heaven and earth to not suck.

2: Hold your tongue. I swear to christ I've gotten to the point (particularly on my last tour) where I was gonna gouge out the eyes of the next person that came up to me and said "dude, the first time I heard you was..." I mean, seriously. That kind of shit can put a motherfucker over the edge. Being humble in person when you're really not is a true art form that has to be practiced. You have to continually remind yourself that you're being paid to entertain, and being a complete prick isn't very entertaining. That is a lesson learned the hard way. (Truthfully, it may not seem like it, but I'm quite affable in person. Ask anyone. Except this one dude in Albany who got on my bad side. Or Lubbock. Or...)

3: Consistency counts. Your fans don't actually want you to experiment, I've found out. Or, at least, they think they don't. I acquired a reputation for abrupt left turns, musically, within the rather confining genre that was Industrial in the 90s. This annoyed many people. I lost roughly 90% of my fan base by deciding for about six months that I'd really rather be in War than Sister Machine Gun. If you're gonna subvert the Long Tail, you can't really pull that shit. If I stuck to ripping off Roli Mossimann productions I'd still have a vibrant career. I would have probably hung myself, too, but there's art in that as well, and that sort of thing never hurts your back catalog.

Long story short, TANSTAAFL as always. The "1000 True Fans" model is absolutely viable, but comes with baggage. Take it from someone that has lived it for two decades. It's hard out here for a pimp.

Comments:
« Previous Page | Next Page »
Page: 1 2 3
What I find funny is that the article once again mentions the magical three years: "One thousand is a feasible number. You could count to 1,000. If you added one fan a day, it would take only three years. "

I wonder if someone has actually coined something called a "three year rule"... Three years is the time about everyone seems to give for any (good) independent production to become self-sustainable. For example, at least three or four of the indie developers (two of them VST/AU plugin devs) I know have quoted the exactly same amount of time, like "if you're prepared to starve, take a loan or do other shit meanwhile, you'll probably start to earn enough in about three years if your product is good enough". Seems like it does apply to other trades than software development, music and web comics too, although I have less anecdotal evidence of that.


posted March 6, 2008 by vae

I figured you'd have some comments on that one. :)

posted March 6, 2008 by darklordjames
The article is worth reading, but here's the same thing said more practically: go take a class at your local adult continuing education center/community college on how to run a small business. Read a book on being a salesman or managing customers.

posted March 6, 2008 by Downpressor
I liked the article for the simple reason that it presents a seemingly reasonable and achievable goal.
It helps to have a carrot to get people like me into action, the modern media landscape can be overwhelming - so a little oversimplification can be just the ticket (sometimes). I'm often victim to "Paralysis by over-analysis" so I appreciate the over-simplified business model.

The key phrase "you can count up to 1000" tells you all you need to know about this particular carrot. It has been genetically designed to attract the bewildered.

posted March 6, 2008 by angstrom

As one of the 800 CR mentioned (probably a faceless one to him, though we've met a few times), I have to agree with most of the article, and CR's observations based on it...except that sometimes his asshattery can in fact be entertaining. As we've seen countless times on this board.

posted March 6, 2008 by UpAngel180
I don't know. I think I'd agree with him a lot more if he decided to listen to his fans and do another album like Torture Technique.

*Ducks*

posted March 6, 2008 by Heretic_D™

or post lyrics?

posted March 6, 2008 by UpAngel180
Along that same line is the following essay by John Scalzi:

link [scalzi.com]

who despite also being somewhat fashionable with the BoingBoing set, happens to be a damn good SF writer and all-around sensible guy.

I especially liked item #3.


posted March 6, 2008 by emeb

I'm stealing my husband's account here to comment. I'm his wife, Mena.

First, Chris, let me say that while I don't know how I feel about your music, (though I hear it endlessly) I do know I admire you as an artist and business person. You give me the impression that if so long as you're dedicated, hard working, and doing what you're good at, there's some room for success even if you don't take the traditional route.

You mentioned that your fans tend to not want you to do anything different or new.

I imagine that might be true for the masses. The masses are like that about anything, and a percent of your fans, anyones fans, come from the masses.

On the other side of it, the 'True Fan' who will drop three hundred dollars on you at least a year, well, they'll follow you off of a bridge.

I know this, because that's my husband all the way. He was an SMG fan, but because he likes what you do, he's willing to plop down our money any time you come out with something new. In fact, I often hear him say things like "Chris is doing something different with bla bla album. I'm looking forward to hearing how it goes."

Then he starts talking about synths and equipment and mixers and my eyes glaze over and I foam a little at the corner of the mouth.

My point is, consistency is the more monetarily effective route. Anything that appeals to the masses always means more money, but don't think that your hard core fans don't go where you go with your diversions.

posted March 6, 2008 by Heretic_D™

just have to add the chris anderson article in wired which is sort of relevant here:

"Free! Why $0.00 Is the Future of Business"

link [www.wired.com]



posted March 6, 2008 by boobs

« Previous Page | Next Page »
Page: 1 2 3
Post a Comment:
You must be logged in to comment.
Login
Welcome to posiNET!
   New User
   Returning Member

Search
Enter your search term below to search analogindustries.com:
Now on kPOSI
» hi-fi stream  (128kbps)
Impossible Recording Machine - Safety in Numbers
» lo-fi stream  (32kbps)
SisterMachineGun - GiantRobot - Carbon Copy