February 5, 2013

Analog Four...

by Chris Randall
 



After several days of slogging around NAMM, and experiencing so many product demos they kind of turned in to a blur of specs, connectors, and knob labels ("SAY iOS AGAIN, MOTHERFUCKER!!!"), when all was said and done there were only two pieces of gear I really wanted. The Prophet 12 and this lil' feller, the Elektron Analog Four. Since the Prophet 12 is made of unobtanium (unless you're Trent Reznor, which I apparently am not) I had to throw money at Sweden when I got home. UPS dropped off a shiny new Analog Four yesterday, and away we go.

I've owned every single piece of Elektron gear except the Octatrack at one time or another, and this unit is a logical progression of the general Elektron design philosophy and UI methodology. As such, thinking of it as a synth isn't really the right tactic. I mean, you can load up a sound, and play it with MIDI, like any other synth. But it is really a synth/sequencer combination, in that without using its own sequencer, you're not getting the full experience. (In much the same vein as a 303, honestly.) The synth topology is designed to take advantage of the internal sequencer, and sounds kind of funky without it.

After playing around a bit, I hooked it up to Live to try making a track. This engendered the usual raft of problems with syncing Elektron gear. Took me an hour or so of fooling about before I remembered that Live 8 and 9 have an adjustment in the MIDI setup panel to time-compensate MIDI clock. In order to get the correct timing differential (which is a result of several factors, including the latency of the audio I/O) I recorded a couple measures of the metronome in the Analog Four, time-corrected them in Live so that they were exactly on the beat, then adjusted the MIDI clock delay value until the recorded metronome and the one coming from the A4 were flanging. For me, this was -40.5ms, but your mileage may vary. In hosts that don't have this clock compensation method, you'll have to delay all the non-A4 tracks by the appropriate amount.

It doesn't seem to have the timing drift and end-of-cycle hiccups that plagued the MachineDrum and MonoMachine (at least when I had them); once I compensated for the clock offset, it is rock solid, timing-wise. I recorded 64 measures of a 16th note white noise tick just to make sure, and a visual check showed every beat was perfectly in time.

In use, it is somewhat easier to program than the MonoMachine. I usually had to resort to programming the MM with an external MIDI controller, as entering note values was quite tedious. The Analog Four includes a 1-octave keyboard on the front panel, and you can either use this to program note values of existing steps, set the note value of steps you're manually entering, or play the selected synth voice live directly. This makes a HUGE difference in ease of use, honestly. I wouldn't have thought such a small addition would do so, but I would have been wrong.

The sequencer, by and large, is identical to the sequencers in the other Elektron products. They've added a "Performance Controls" section, which is per-kit and can be used for macro control of all sounds, so you don't have to go menu diving during live performance. This is a very nice addition for live use, I imagine, although I don't do hardly any of that any more.

The synth is intriguing. They somehow managed to bring their sound design philosophy to a nearly entirely analog environment, which is quite a trick considering how digital their previous products are. Even though it is very obviously an analog synth, it still sounds entirely Elektron. As to whether this is your cup of tea is a subjective opinion. I like the topology quite a bit. The only real minus is that each mod source only has two destinations. This necessarily limits the complexity of the sounds. But it still sounds unique, which is the important thing. Most of the true analog synths that have come out in the last couple years are virtually identical in their topology, differing only in the filter design. This unit doesn't have that problem.

Overall, I like it, and I think it is well worth the money. You're essentially getting four independent analog synths, an effects engine, a sophisticated live performance sequencer, and a full CV/gate control brain for a small modular, all in one convenient package. Figure each synth costs $275 (which is, it must be said, a steal for such a sophisticated and unique analog voice) and all the rest of the stuff is a bonus.

Now, it won't just drop in to your rig like any other synth. It is its own environment, and has a much steeper learning curve than a typical 2-osc analog. It also sounds very Elektron, and the results you're going to get are going to rapidly taper to a particular sound and vibe that is heavily informed by the sequencer. But that said, it is sophisticated, powerful, and sounds good. My only real complaint is that there aren't individual outs for the voices; it only has stereo outs. This can be dealt with, but it is obviously easier to have multi outs in a modern production environment.

My recommendation is Buy It Now, at the end of the day. If you have any specific questions, I'll be happy to attempt to answer them.
 
 
 

33 comments:

Page 1 of 4
 
 

 
Feb.05.2013 @ 11:13 AM
WhatisValis
I was really impressed from watching the Sonicstate walk through, parameter lock per step looks great.
 
 

 
Feb.05.2013 @ 11:19 AM
Chris Randall
Elektron more-or-less invented the concept of parameter lock as we know it today. Over the last few years, they've really got it down to a science.

In the A4 (I can't remember if this was the case in the MonoMachine, but I don't believe it was) you can even parameter lock the patch itself. That is to say that you can have steps 1-4 be one patch, step 5 be a second one, step 6 be a third one, and so on. (This is how they get kick, hi-hat, and snare out of a single track in the demo videos in a monophonic synth.)

-CR
 
 

 
Feb.05.2013 @ 12:52 PM
tngregory
thank you for the extensive write up. i hope it might be the first of many as i have few elektron selectors to chat with.

curious, was yours loaded with sounds? i've scoured youtube videos and found many users dialing up sounds from a menu. for the life of me i cannot find this mystery bank of sounds.
 
 

 
Feb.05.2013 @ 1:46 PM
Chris Randall
There is a storage bin for 128 programs that don't live in kits. The unit comes with 32 of those sounds programmed, but honestly, they're not god's gift. But this is where you would store individual sounds and the pool from whence you would draw if you were parameter-locking the sounds themselves.

There are also 32 kits; these are the kits that are used to make the factory preset patterns and such-like. A kit is four sounds, plus the FX unit settings. You can't load these programs out individually; you have to take the whole set.

The factory programs are not great, and usually they're so intimately tied to the sequences that show them off that they're not really usable by themselves. Elektron's method of Banks of Patterns, Kits of Sounds, and individual Sounds is definitely odd, and takes some time to understand. This is common among all their products; I personally am used to it and know it, so it doesn't bother me, but it's not the way I would do it.

-CR
 
 

 
Feb.05.2013 @ 3:03 PM
krylenko
You had a SIDstation? I don't know why exactly but it doesn't seem like your cup of meat.
 
 

 
Feb.05.2013 @ 3:08 PM
xmodz
Can I ask what parameter lock is in terms of how Elektron implements it?

Based on your description, I assume that the parameter lock per step means that you can essentially have a snapshot of all parameters on the machine and switch between those snapshots(aka parameter locks) per step?
 
 

 
Feb.05.2013 @ 4:18 PM
Chad
Also had a chance to play with this at NAMM. The macro controls and the interface sold me on it. I get lost having 2 rows of 5 knobs over 2x 4, although that's a good thing.

I just wish they didn't limit the MIDI Out features to protect the OctaTrack. The Macro controls are similar to the way that I use Scenes on the OT (although more involved to setup the desired macros on the A4). If MIDI Out from the sequencer and knobs was available on the A4 it'd be the center piece of my rig. I'm hoping, maybe they will change their minds and add it in an update.
 
 

 
Feb.05.2013 @ 4:50 PM
Chris Randall
@xmodz: In Elektron products, you hold down a step button on the sequencer, and make adjustments to any controls you want. These are delta values, not absolute values. So if you set the filter freq to, say, 1K, and then adjust step 3's value to 1.2K, the parameter lock is recorded as a +20% change. In this manner, if you raise the filter freq to 2K, the parameter lock's value is 2.4K, not 1.2K.

It's an interesting method. The entire sequencer works this way, and you can do it with the CV outputs, the send effects, whatever.

@krylenko: I bought it when they were first released. I believe I had serial #0008. This was before Malcom McLaren's famous article in Wired that set the "chip music" scene in motion. Nowadays, I probably wouldn't buy one. But at the time, it was a strange and wonderful beast, and not belabored by silly notions.

Funny side story: I sold it after they had ran out, and it was very desirable. Even though I bought it new, and had to pay import duty from Sweden, I got almost twice what I paid for it on eBay.

-CR
 
 

 
Feb.05.2013 @ 5:15 PM
krylenko
Yeah, I bought pretty early (don't remember my s/n), but I sold just *before* they ran out and IIRC made my money back. I can't believe the used prices now.

I loved the build quality and some of the sounds, but found the UI uninspiring and the sonic sweet spot too small. I wouldn't get one again to play either.
 
 

 
Feb.05.2013 @ 7:04 PM
kslight
The A4 looks cool, and I admittedly have been considering it just for the sake of having a compact sequencer driven analog synth/drum machine. A few things are holding me back:

1. Wish I could try it in person before making a purchase.

2. Not sure about the sound? A lot of the demos I've heard left me kind of wishing I was at the controls to figure out how it really sounds. In the demos it has seemed like a slight letdown.

3. Not sure if I could make a sequencer driven instrument happen in my setup. Tried it with an FR777 several year ago and couldn't ever make it work. Handy thing was, at least I made double my money like your Sidstation.



So consequently, this means you need to post some noodles on your new toy.



Of course Trent Reznor gets the Prophet 12.
 
 

 
Page 1 of 4
 
 

Comment:

 

Sorry, commenting is closed for this blog entry.